Preparation of thermoplastic elastomer nanocomposites based on polyamide‐6/polyepichlorohydrin‐<i>co</i>‐ethylene oxide
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This work is aimed at determining the effect of nanoclay and polyepichlorohydrin‐ co ‐ethylene oxide (ECO) content on the microstructure and mechanical properties of PA6/ECO thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs). TPE nanocomposites were prepared in a laboratory mixer using polyamide 6 (PA6), ECO, and an organoclay by a two‐step melt mixing process. First, the PA6 was melt blended with Cloisite 30B and then mixed by ECO rubber. X‐ray diffraction results and transmission electron microscopy image showed that the nanoclay platelets were nearly exfoliated in both the phases. The SEM photomicrograph of PA6 with ECO showed that the elastomer particles are dispersed throughout the polyamide matrix and the size of rubber particles is less than 3 μm. Introduction of organoclay in the PA6 matrix increased the size of dispersed rubber particles in comparison with the unfilled but otherwise similar blends. The nanoscale dimension of the dispersed clay results in an improvement of the tensile modulus of the nanocomposites. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it