MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017649024 · doi:10.2118/0313-0052-jpt

Seismic Unwired: Cutting the Cable Can Help in Difficult Spots

2013· article· en· W2017649024 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDiverse Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismologySubmarine pipelineGeologyTelecommunicationsWirelessComputer scienceOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seismic Unwired David Monk said Apache Corp. uses wireless seismic receivers when it cites advantages over traditional systems connected together by cables. Examples offered by Apache’s worldwide director of geophysics include a prospect that straddled the border of Argentina and Chile where equipment and radio signals were not allowed to cross; a survey in the shallow waters of the Gulf of Mexico where production platforms would get in the way of streamers used to pick up seismic signals; onshore areas where the cost of crews is high, which is the case in much of the US and Canada; and the Cook Inlet where the extreme environment offshore and onshore made wireless the choice for a number of reasons. “These things are more efficient systems over more difficult terrain,” Monk said. At the time of the interview nearly all the seismic exploration projects for Apache were wireless. Eliminating the bright orange or yellow cables reduces the weight of the system, can make it easier to work around obstacles or in difficult waters, and can significantly reduce the profile of seismic exploration in areas where that activity may not be welcome. A case study by Geospace, a maker of wireless receivers, of a seismic shoot done on the plains of Colombia by Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp., concluded a crew of 21 could lay down the wireless seismic receivers that would have required workers if it had been wired. And a side-by-side comparison by Apache in the Cook Inlet showed the quality of the seismic data gathered on land was similar for wired and unwired receivers, but wireless performed far better offshore in an area known for its difficult tides and currents. Apache is a wireless pioneer and is far from the norm in an industry where the largest seismic receiver provider, Sercel, estimates 90% of the seismic channels in use are wired. But the rapid takeoff of wireless receiver sales suggests that is changing. In most cases one channel, with a geophone that detects the echoes used for underground mapping, is equal to one wireless unit. Wireless multichannel units, though, are a growing part of the market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it