MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017894656 · doi:10.1111/1475-4932.12119

Government Size, Government Debt and Economic Performance with Particular Application to New Zealand

2014· article· en· W2017894656 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Record · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsGovernment debtDebtGovernment (linguistics)Fiscal policyPer capitaMonetary economicsDebt-to-GDP ratioGovernment revenueDebt ratioEconomic policyPublic financeMacroeconomicsInternal debt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This analysis finds that long‐run government size and private per capita output have an inverted U‐shaped relationship, with the positive effect of government size peaking at close to 30 per cent of GDP . As larger debt is also associated with lower levels of private output, the recent policy of contraction in government size and debt in New Zealand has produced an output premium. The short‐run analysis suggests that the inverse relationship found between changes in government size and economic growth is attributable to counter‐cyclical fiscal policy. This reinforces the traditional role of fiscal policy in New Zealand while cautioning against longer‐run spillovers from larger government size and debt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it