MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017951461 · doi:10.1176/pn.43.9.0040

Residents Have Mixed Emotions About Parental-Leave Policies

2008· article· en· W2017951461 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealthcare Policy and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstitutionPsychologyResidency trainingFamily medicineMedical educationMedicineContinuing educationPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Education & TrainingFull AccessResidents Have Mixed Emotions About Parental-Leave PoliciesMark MoranMark MoranPublished Online:2 May 2008https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.43.9.0040Psychiatry residency programs are perceived by residents to be generally supportive of parenting during training, but about 30 percent of residents also said in a recent survey that they are somewhat or very dissatisfied with maternal/paternal leave policies offered by their training institution.Moreover, pregnancy and parenting during residency appear to be a source of conflict among residents who are parents and residents who are not parents.Those were some findings from a survey of psychiatry residents at 13 institutions presented at a poster session at the March meeting of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training (AADPRT). The survey was conducted by APA/GlaxoSmithKline Fellows Vishal Madaan, M.D., Joel Johnson, M.D., Keith Stowell, M.D., Rachel Molander, M.D., Anita Khurana, M.D., Joshua Bess, M.D., Robert Oldham, M.D., Glen Davis, M.D., Anna Gross, M.D., and Zachary Freyberg, M.D.The survey, approved by the Institutional Review Board at Creighton University/University of Nebraska Medical Center, consisted of a 39-item questionnaire on pregnancy and parenting issues during psychiatry residency and on parental-leave policy. It was sent to 537 psychiatry residents and fellows in 13 programs in 10 states. The survey asked trainees about their attitudes toward becoming a parent during residency, their understanding of their institution's parental-leave policy, new parents' experience, and the availability of amenities for new parents in their program.(In the second half of their ongoing research, they are also studying the perceptions of training directors regarding parental-leave policy.)Thirty-eight residents out of 147 respondents had become parents during training, and 13 of these new parents were required to extend their training for a certain period, mostly from a few weeks to 20 week. At least one resident, however, was required to extend her training by a year. Moreover, 11 of the 13 who had to extend their training were women, suggesting a disproportionate burden shared by female residents."One of our most important findings was the lack of consistency in parental-leave policies across the various training programs in the country," Vishal Madaan, M.D., who presented the poster at the AADPRT meeting, told Psychiatric News. Madaan is a resident at Creighton University/University of Nebraska Medical Center."In fact," he continued, in addition to having their training extended, "most 'new parents' in residency had to utilize their vacation and sick leave as a part of their parental leave.... This does not happen in Canada, where, for instance, new parents are given more than 12 weeks leave along with salary and benefits."The average age of new parents was 34 and for residents who were not parents, 31. "Most of the residents who were parents were older, married, and white," Madaan said."The other important finding was that residents who were not new parents expressed some resentment about fellow residents who were given leave, since the added workload was left on them," Madaan said. "This suggests that the current system creates some conflict among the various stakeholders—the residents who are new parents, their families, co-residents who are not new parents, training directors who try to ensure fairness for all residents, and the clinical sites that benefit from the residents' employment and support them financially."A majority of the residents who took family leave did so during PGY-3. New parents wished for a longer family leave and better salary support, and residents in general felt the need for formal information regarding parental-leave policy, development of a paternal leave policy, and improvements in existing policy to reduce the burden on other residents.Madaan and colleagues offered several possible solutions for training institutions and residency directors. Prominent among these was to offer an orientation session about parental-leave policies during the internship year."Many of the residents, including those who were not parents, expressed a wish to be better advised about what the policies were at their institutions," he said.Other solutions include allowing greater flexibility with rotations and call schedules, part-time work and job sharing, and allowing residents on leave to attend didactic lectures.The survey authors also recommended that training programs could offer breast-feeding support and accessible daycare.Madaan said the APA/GlaxoSmithKline fellows were writing an action paper for the APA Assembly on pregnancy and parenting during residency."Given the changing demographics of psychiatry residents and medical students, especially with increasing numbers of females, we thought this was a really important area for us to explore," he told Psychiatric News. ▪ ISSUES NewArchived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it