MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Smoking Cessation in Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Goal or Prerequisite?

2002· article· en· W2018107390 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCOPDSmoking cessationPulmonary rehabilitationRehabilitationPhysical therapySurgeon generalPulmonary function testingDiseaseIntensive care medicinePublic healthInternal medicineNursingPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been more than 35 years since the Surgeon General of the United States released the first report of the Advisory Committee on Smoking and Health. Cigarette smoking has been identified as the most important source of preventable morbidity and premature mortality in North America. During the 1990s, tobacco was the largest single cause of premature death in the developed world. Smoking cessation is followed by immediate health benefits in terms of symptoms and organ function. It dramatically reduces the risk of most smoking-related diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer. Respiratory rehabilitation has been defined as a multidimensional continuum of services directed to persons with pulmonary disease and their families, usually by an interdisciplinary team of specialists, with the goal of achieving and maintaining the individual's maximum level of independence and functioning in the community. A European Respiratory Society task force on rehabilitation recently commented that respiratory rehabilitation must address medical management including reinforcement of smoking cessation, education of the patient and family, exercise reconditioning, physical and occupational therapy, nutritional support, and long-term oxygen therapy. Many patients have quit smoking by the time they enroll in a pulmonary rehabilitation program. Nevertheless, the inclusion of smokers in respiratory rehabilitation programs remains controversial. Among 14 trials included in a meta-analysis of respiratory rehabilitation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the smoking status of the patients was reported in 9 of the trials, and only 2 trials stated that smoking was an absolute exclusion criterion for enrollment. Some investigators have used a trial of smoking cessation as an index of the patient's motivation to improve his or her health status. This article describes the effect of smoking on the course of COPD and the opportunity to address smoking in the context of comprehensive rehabilitation. The authors' line of reasoning is that (1) smoking causes COPD and perpetuates the pathophysiologic processes defining the disease, (2) symptomatic COPD does not facilitate smoking cessation, (3) smoking may alter rehabilitation outcomes, and (4) if smoking cessation is not a prerequisite to pulmonary rehabilitation, then a smoking cessation intervention should at least he offered as part of such a program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it