MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018387818 · doi:10.1080/02687030344000238

The consequences of severe aphasia on the spouses of aphasic people: A description of the adaptation process

2003· article· en· W2018387818 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAphasiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalCentre de réadaptation Lethbridge-Layton-Mackay
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAphasiaPsychologyCoping (psychology)Developmental psychologyInterpersonal communicationAdaptation (eye)Social isolationCognitive psychologyClinical psychologyPsychotherapistSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background : Aphasia changes the links an individual has with his/her social milieu. However, information about these changes is sparse as most research on aphasia has been centred on understanding this language disorder and testing treatment methods. Moreover, information about the psycho-social consequences of severe aphasia is even rarer. Aims : To determine the consequences of severe aphasia as experienced by spouses of persons with aphasia. Methods & Procedures : A qualitative phenomenological approach was adopted. Spouses of five persons with relatively longstanding severe aphasia were interviewed with a semi-structured qualitative schedule. The analysis was guided by the data and by a model of the adaptation process. Outcomes & Results : Spouses' perceived sources of stress related to various changes in lifestyle habits more or less explicitly related to the aphasic person's communication impairment. These consequences were experienced in the realms of communication, interpersonal relationships, responsibilities, leisure activities, and finances. Spouses employed coping strategies. These strategies were directly based on the problems they encountered or on the control of the significance of these problems. Spouses experienced various indicators of adaptation such as fatigue, anxiety, discouragement, loss of privacy, social isolation and burden. These consequences, coping strategies, and indications of adaptation were functions of the contextual stimuli of these couples. Conclusions : These results serve to describe how spouses experience lifestyle changes associated to the aphasia in their partner. Speech-language therapy could contribute to minimise the impact of aphasia on both spouses and aphasic people by considering how spouses adapt to aphasia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it