MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018701854 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2005-027-9

On the Structure of the Spreading Models of a Banach Space

2005· article· en· W2018701854 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Banach Space Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPacific Institute for the Mathematical SciencesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsBanach spaceSeparable spaceCountable setSubspace topologyPure mathematicsSequence (biology)Space (punctuation)Discrete mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We study some questions concerning the structure of the set of spreading models of a separable infinite-dimensional Banach space X . In particular we give an example of a reflexive X so that all spreading models of X contain ℓ 1 but none of them is isomorphic to ℓ 1 . We also prove that for any countable set C of spreading models generated by weakly null sequences there is a spreading model generated by a weakly null sequence which dominates each element of C . In certain cases this ensures that X admits, for each α < ω 1 , a spreading model such that if α < β then is dominated by (and not equivalent to) . Some applications of these ideas are used to give sufficient conditions on a Banach space for the existence of a subspace and an operator defined on the subspace, which is not a compact perturbation of a multiple of the inclusion map.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it