MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018760078 · doi:10.2140/pjm.2013.263.87

Explicit isogeny theorems for Drinfeld modules

2013· article· en· W2018760078 on OpenAlexaff
Imin Chen, Yoonjin Lee

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Journal of Mathematics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversitySimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsogenyMathematicsPure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldElliptic curve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let F = ‫ކ‬ q (T ) and A = ‫ކ‬ q [T ].Given two nonisogenous rank-r Drinfeld A-modules φ and φ over K , where K is a finite extension of F, we obtain a partially explicit upper bound (dependent only on φ and φ ) on the degree of primes ℘ of K such that P ℘ (φ) = P ℘ (φ ), where P ℘ ( * ) denotes the characteristic polynomial of Frobenius at ℘ on a Tate module of * .The bounds are completely explicit in terms of the defining coefficients of φ and φ , except for one term, which can be made explicit in the case of r = 2.An ingredient in the proof of the partially explicit isogeny theorem for general rank is an explicit bound for the different divisor of torsion fields of Drinfeld modules, which detects primes of potentially good reduction.Our results are a Drinfeld module analogue of Serre's work (1981), but the results we obtain are unconditional because the generalized Riemann hypothesis holds for function fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePacific Journal of MathematicsSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207