Sub-pixel target detection in LWIR hyperspectral imagery using ground leaving radiance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The processing chain leading to specific material detection in hyperspectral imagery implies the use of atmospherically corrected images of emissivity or reflectance before comparing image signatures to a database of materials' signatures. This is a sensible approach for the reflective hyperspectral bands l and when the pixels are completely filled with a uniform material in the LWIR bands (8 to 12 microns). In the LWIR, the atmospheric correction process is different of what is used in the reflective bands and involves the use of a temperature and emissivity separation process (TES). If the pixel is not filled with a uniform material and the measured radiance is produced from the mix of materials having different emissivity and temperatures, the output of the TES will not be linear in temperature and in emissivity and will be contaminated by the non-linear mix of the temperature and emissivity of the materials leading to a potential for confusion during the detection process. In this paper, we propose a detection approach using the ground leaving radiance that is used directly to perform detection using emissivity signatures contained in a database. The detection results using this process are compared with the detection results using the output of a TES algorithm. The study is performed in simulation without noise and with the exact knowledge of the downwelling irradiance. The results show that a detection algorithm using the ground leaving radiance performs better than its counterpart using the emissivity when the difference in temperature increases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it