MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019032661 · doi:10.1353/ecs.0.0096

"Read, read, read, read, my unlearned reader!": Five Twenty-First-Century Studies of Laurence Sterne and His Works

2009· article· en· W2019032661 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographyArt historyArtPerformance artClassicsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Read, read, read, read, my unlearned reader!":Five Twenty-First-Century Studies of Laurence Sterne and His Works Melvyn New Lana Asfour , Laurence Sterne in France (London: Continuum, 2008). Pp. xiii, 182. $130.00. [End Page 122] René Bosch , Labyrinth of Digressions: Tristram Shandy as Perceived and Influenced by Sterne's Early Imitators, trans. Piet Verhoeff (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2007). Pp. 319. $89.00. Martha F. Bowden , Yorick's Congregation: The Church of England in the Time of Laurence Sterne (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2007). Pp. 291. $57.50. Alexis Tadié , Sterne's Whimsical Theatres of Language: Orality, Gesture, Literacy (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2003). Pp. viii, 193. $110.00. Carol Watts , The Cultural Work of Empire: The Seven Years' War and the Imagining of the Shandean State (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007). Pp. ix, 335. $65.00. The first decade of the twentieth century was auspicious for Sterneans. In 1904 Wilbur Cross published the first modern edition of Sterne's works in ten volumes, with an additional two volumes containing Percy Fitzgerald's expanded edition of his 1864 Sterne biography. Cross, still dissatisfied with Fitzgerald's biography, published his own Life and Times of Laurence Sterne in 1909, revised and republished in 1923 and again in 1929. The Cross edition of Works was standard until replaced (ever so slowly) by the Florida edition; his biography remained the primary authority until Arthur Cash's thorough reexamination of Sterne's life (2 vols., 1976, 1984). Among the noteworthy critics who wrote about Sterne in that first decade, we might mention Herbert Paul, Men and Letters (1901), Paul Elmer More, Shelburne Essays (1904), Charles Whibley, Studies in Frankness (1910), and Virginia Woolf, whose first of several insightful discussions of Sterne appeared in the TLS in 1909. Also worth mentioning in view of the ever-increasing international status of Sterne is H. W. Hewett-Thayer, Laurence Sterne in Germany (1905), and Francis Brown Barton, Étude sur l'influence de Laurence Sterne en France au dixhuitième siècle (1911). The first decade of the twenty-first century has also begun auspiciously. I will recuse myself from commenting on some of this work: the Florida edition of A Sentimental Journey and Bramine's Journal (2002) and Letters (2009), volumes 6–8 of the Florida edition of the Works of Sterne, for obvious reasons; Thomas Keymer's Sterne, The Moderns and the Novel (2002), and Peter de Voogd and John Neubauer's The Reception of Laurence Sterne in Europe (2004), because I have reviewed them elsewhere; and W. B. Gerard's Laurence Sterne and the Visual Imagination (2006), because the author studied under me. The Shandean, an annual edited by de Voogd, continues to provide useful documentary and critical essays devoted to Sterne. Two collections of essays on Tristram, the Oxford Casebook (2006) and the Cambridge Companion (2009), both edited by Keymer, and new textbook editions of Tristram Shandy (2004), edited by Robert Folkenflik, and Sentimental Journey and Bramine's Journal (2006), edited by me and W. G. Day, indicate that Sterne is still read in the university. It is a sign of Sterne's international reputation that for two years of this first decade of our century, France has had Tristram on its Agrégation list; that two of the titles under review here are by French scholars, while a third deals with Sterne's reputation in eighteenth-century France; and that another title first appeared as a Dutch doctoral dissertation, now translated into English. And although our century may not be able to claim a Virginia Woolf, we can note that the Nobelist [End Page 123] author Orhan Pamuk has written a splendid introduction to the first Turkish translation of Tristram. Lana Asfour's Laurence Sterne in France is a brief study, narrowed in scope by her decision to examine Sterne's reception for only forty years, from 1760 to 1800. Historically speaking, the years could not be more important, but Asfour hardly mentions the Revolution and its aftermath, concentrating instead on several aesthetic issues that leave us wondering how, during all that turmoil, anyone found time to read and comment on Sterne. Not surprisingly, French criticism reflects English criticism at the time...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it