MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019173865 · doi:10.1029/2007ja012678

Electron scattering by whistler‐mode ELF hiss in plasmaspheric plumes

2008· article· en· W2019173865 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHissVan Allen radiation beltElectron precipitationPitch anglePhysicsScatteringElectronWhistlerPlasmasphereComputational physicsMagnetospherePlumeAtomic physicsGeophysicsPlasmaOpticsNuclear physicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonadiabatic loss processes of radiation belt energetic electrons include precipitation loss to the atmosphere due to pitch‐angle scattering by various magnetospheric plasma wave modes. Here we consider electron precipitation loss due to pitch‐angle scattering by whistler‐mode ELF hiss in plasmaspheric plumes. Using wave observations and inferred plasma densities from the Plasma Wave Experiment on the Combined Release and Radiation Effects Satellite (CRRES), we analyze plume intervals for which well‐determined hiss spectral intensities are available. We then select 14 representative plumes for detailed study, comprising 10 duskside plumes and 4 nonduskside plumes, with local hiss amplitudes ranging from maximum values of above 300 pT to minimum values of less than 1 pT. We estimate the electron loss timescale τ loss due to pitch‐angle scattering by hiss in each chosen plume as a function of L ‐shell and electron energy; τ loss is calculated from quasi‐linear theory as the inverse of the bounce‐averaged diffusion rate evaluated at the equatorial loss cone angle. We find that pitch‐angle scattering by hiss in plumes can be efficient for inducing precipitation loss of outer‐zone electrons with energies throughout the range 100 keV to 1 MeV, though the magnitude of τ loss can be highly dependent on wave power, L ‐shell, and electron energy. For 100‐ to 200‐keV electrons, typically τ loss ∼ 1 day while the minimum loss timescale ( τ loss ) min ∼ hours. For 500‐keV to 1‐MeV electrons, typically ( τ loss ) min ∼ days, while ( τ loss ) min < 1 day in the case of large wave amplitude (∼100's pT). Apart from inducing direct precipitation loss of MeV electrons, scattering by hiss in plumes may reduce the generation of MeV electrons by depleting the lower energy electron seed population. Models of the dynamical variation of the outer‐zone electron flux should incorporate electron precipitation loss induced by ELF hiss scattering in plasmaspheric plumes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it