MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Drop breakup in combined shear and extensional flow conditions

2000· article· en· W2019248566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Polymer Technology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreakupMaterials scienceDrop (telecommunication)Newtonian fluidExtensional definitionShear flowRheologyShear (geology)MechanicsNon-Newtonian fluidViscoelasticityComposite materialPhysicsGeologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drop breakup is an important part of the study of polymer blending. During mixing, large domains of fluids are stretched and broken up into smaller droplets. To obtain a good dispersion of a multiphase system, the size and location of the suspended phase domains need to be optimized. It was seen that breakup mechanisms depend on the deformation process and the material studied. Shear and extensional flows were investigated and different breakup phenomena were observed. A Newtonian fluid and a viscoelastic solution for the dispersed phase were used to focus on the differences due to the fluid properties; the matrix fluid was Newtonian. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Adv Polym Techn 19: 14–21, 2000

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it