MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019560524 · doi:10.1145/2626371

A Model-Based Approach for Crawling Rich Internet Applications

2014· article· en· W2019560524 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on the Web · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb Application Security Vulnerabilities
Canadian institutionsIBM (Canada)University of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInternational Business Machines Corporation
KeywordsCrawlingComputer scienceWeb crawlerThe InternetWorld Wide WebWeb applicationAjax

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Web technologies, like AJAX, result in more responsive and interactive Web applications, sometimes called Rich Internet Applications (RIAs). Crawling techniques developed for traditional Web applications are not sufficient for crawling RIAs. The inability to crawl RIAs is a problem that needs to be addressed for at least making RIAs searchable and testable. We present a new methodology, called “model-based crawling”, that can be used as a basis to design efficient crawling strategies for RIAs. We illustrate model-based crawling with a sample strategy, called the “hypercube strategy”. The performances of our model-based crawling strategies are compared against existing standard crawling strategies, including breadth-first, depth-first, and a greedy strategy. Experimental results show that our model-based crawling approach is significantly more efficient than these standard strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it