MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019751792 · doi:10.1145/1356058.1356062

Phase-based adaptive recompilation in a JVM

2008· article· en· W2019751792 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSpeedupCompilerJavaProfiling (computer programming)Code (set theory)Parallel computingJust-in-time compilationSource codeDistributed computingProgramming languageSet (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern JIT compilers often employ multi-level recompilation strategies as a means of ensuring the most used code is also the most highly optimized, balancing optimization costs and expected future performance. Accurate selection of code to compile and level of optimization to apply is thus important to performance. In this paper we investigate the effect of an improved recompilation strategy for a Java virtual machine. Our design makes use of a lightweight, low-level profiling mechanism to detect high-level, variable length phases in program execution. Phases are then used to guide adaptive recompilation choices, improving performance. We develop both an offline implementation based on trace data and a self-contained online version. Our offline study shows an average speedup of 8.7% and up to 21%, and our online system achieves an average speedup of 4.4%, up to 18%. We subject our results to extensive analysis and show that our design achieves good overall performance with high consistency despite the existence of many complex and interacting factors in such an environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it