Nova Scotia Improving the delivery of stroke care services
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been more than a decade since the initial publication of Langhorne and his colleagues’ systematic review1 which demonstrated that organised stroke care is superior to other systems of care for patients with stroke. Since then, this message has been repeated, advertised, and written about extensively, and has formed the basis of many national stroke care guidelines and consensus statements around the world. Unfortunately, in many (some would say most) places, the actual organisation of acute stroke care services has not yet been formalised, and the relatively simple messages of the systematic review have not been adopted in a consistent manner, to the detriment of countless people with stroke and their families. Fortunately, this is beginning to change—a change that is beginning to happen in Nova Scotia, and throughout Canada. Nova Scotia is one of Canada’s Maritime provinces, and is home to just under one million people. Many of the population are descendents of the British, Irish, and French, but the province is becoming increasingly multi-ethnic. Approximately 60% of the population live outside major cities. As a …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it