Young People's Impressions of Older Adults: The Role of Exercise Habit Information
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study examined younger adults' impressions of older adults based upon information regarding older adults' exercise habits. Two hundred and forty-six young adults (mean age = 19.89; SD = 1.41) randomly rated a description of a retired older man or woman described as an exerciser, non-exerciser, or control on 18 personality and 9 physical dimensions. Results indicated eight out of eighteen personality and eight of the nine physical dimensions; a MANOVA indicated a significant effect with post hoc tests revealing that exercisers were rated more positively than non-exercisers. The exerciser stereotype emerged regardless of the respondent's self-classified exercise status. These results suggest that young adults form more positive impressions of older adults who exercise. The implications for young and older adults regarding the self-presentational benefits associated with exercise participation are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it