MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2020988382 · doi:10.1080/10298436.2010.535538

Reliability-based initial pavement performance deterioration modelling

2011· article· en· W2020988382 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Pavement Engineering · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Bayesian probabilityProbabilistic logicInternational Roughness IndexBayesian inferenceBayesian networkComputer scienceStatisticsReliability engineeringEngineeringEconometricsMathematicsSurface finish

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an approach for incorporating reliability on initial performance prediction models developed from as little as two time series predictors. It employs a novel methodology to provide apparent ages as surrogate of condition and in addition applies multilevel Bayesian regression to calibrate mechanistic empirical models to local conditions. The paper develops an IRI deterministic performance model for the Costa Rica road network and, further shows the procedure for obtaining a probabilistic multilevel Bayesian model which includes distributions of the mechanistic parameters and confidence intervals for the predicted performance. Bayesian statistics are also deployed for calibrating pavement strength coefficients to local observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it