A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- Metaresearch, Bibliometrics, Scholarly communication
- Consensus categories
- Metaresearch
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: ObservationalConsensus signal: Observational
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.209
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 1.000
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.041 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.088 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Abstract We chronicle the use of acknowledgments in 20th‐century scholarship by analyzing and classifying more than 4,500 specimens covering a 100‐year period. Our results show that the intensity of acknowledgment varies by discipline, reflecting differences in prevailing sociocognitive structures and work practices. We demonstrate that the acknowledgment has gradually established itself as a constitutive element of academic writing, one that provides a revealing insight into the nature and extent of subauthorship collaboration. Complementary data on rates of coauthorship are also presented to highlight the growing importance of collaboration and the increasing division of labor in contemporary research and scholarship.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
- Topic
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Field
- Decision Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- not available
- Funders
- University of California, Los AngelesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignMonash UniversityNorthwestern UniversityYork UniversityDurham UniversityUniversity of Colorado BoulderUniversity of St AndrewsMcGill UniversityUniversity of ReadingUniversity of OxfordUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnUniversity of Notre DameUniversity of Southern CaliforniaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUniversity College LondonCarnegie Mellon UniversityAmes Research CenterMacquarie UniversityHarvard UniversityVirginia Commonwealth UniversityTulane UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaOhio State UniversityKing's College LondonMenzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of LondonUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversity of TorontoYale UniversitySan Francisco State UniversityPrinceton University
- Keywords
- ScholarshipPeriod (music)Element (criminal law)SociologyWork (physics)Social scienceLibrary scienceEpistemologyPsychologyComputer sciencePolitical scienceAestheticsArtPhilosophyLawEngineering
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes