MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021277295 · doi:10.1063/1.3581063

Stationary residual layers in buoyant Newtonian displacement flows

2011· article· en· W2021277295 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsPhysicsOpen-channel flowLaminar flowNewtonian fluidFlow (mathematics)Displacement (psychology)Inclined planePipe flowLubrication theoryLubricationPlane (geometry)ThermodynamicsGeometryTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study buoyant displacement flows with two miscible fluids of equal viscosity in ducts that are inclined at angles close to horizontal (β≈90°). As the imposed velocity (V̂0) is increased from zero, we change from an exchange flow dominated regime to a regime in which the front velocity (V̂f) increases linearly with V̂0. During this transition, we observed an interesting phenomenon in which the layer of displaced fluid remained at the top of the pipe (diameter D̂) during the entire duration of the experiment, apparently stationary for times t̂≳103D̂/V̂0 (the stationary residual layer). Our investigation revealed that this flow marks the transition between flows with a back flow, counter to the imposed flow, and those that displace instantaneously. The same phenomena are observed in pipes (experiments) and in plane channels (two-dimensional numerical computations). A lubrication/thin-film model of the flows also shows the transition from back flow to instantaneous displacement. At long times, this model has a stationary residual layer solution of the type observed, which is found at a unique ratio χ of the axial viscous velocity to the imposed velocity. The prediction of the stationary residual layer from the lubrication model is compared with the transition in observed behavior in our pipe flow experiments and our 2D numerical displacements in the channel. Reasonable agreement is found for the pipe and excellent agreement for the channel. Physically, in either geometry at transition, the upper layer of the fluid is in a countercurrent motion with zero net volumetric flux; the velocity at the interface is positive, but the velocity of the interface is zero. This results from a delicate balance between buoyancy forces against the mean flow and viscous forces in the direction of the mean flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it