Writing Individual Journalist's Memories into Collective Memory
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article considers the ways that journalists' personal memories impact on the process of constructing collective memories, while analyzing how journalists mitigate the political, professional, and personal aspects of their lives. It compares the memories of local journalists with the memories of journalists working for national newspapers concerning the same international event, the arrival of the Amelie on Canadian shores in 1987, when 174 Indian refugees spontaneously landed in Charlesville, Nova Scotia (population 77). Personal memories and expressions of forgetting conflict with, or conversely, support, published representations, and allow for an exploration of the impact of personal memories in this specific realm. Power, identity, and emotions are all central to the production and circulation of social memories, as are relationships to places. This article unpacks journalists' personal comments related to forgetting and emotions in order to explore disjunctures which affect the social memories of communities through print media news reports.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it