Data limited assessment of selected North American anadromous charr stocks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Charr populations are particularly susceptible to change, either from the application of harvest or environmental conditions such as climate variation. As an alternative to conventional fishery analysis, we analyze the sustainability and viability of selected North American charr stocks using a number of approaches. We compare several methods for data limited situations to determine the allowable harvest of the Ekalluk River, Paliryauk River, Halovik River, Jayco Lake and Lauchlan River Arctic Charr including Cadima’s Maximum Sustainable Production Method, Hierarchical Bayesian Surplus Production Models, a Status Quo Total Allowable Harvest method, Long-term Average Catch methods and the Depletion-Corrected Average Catch method. Each method provided a similar outcome in terms of the relative importance of stocks to the fishery. The predicted sustainable harvest of larger stocks such as the Ekalluk and Jayco varied more according to the method applied than the other stocks studied. While not a replacement for more comprehensive fishery models these methods can be useful in data poor situations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it