A Theoretical Investigation of the Remarkable Nuclear Spin−Spin Coupling Pattern in [(NC)<sub>5</sub>Pt−Tl(CN)]<sup>-</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We address the problem of the interpretation of heavy nucleus spin-spin couplings for systems being studied in solution. Solvation can create counterintuitive features concerning the spin-spin couplings, which are enhanced by relativistic effects due to the presence of heavy nuclei. This should therefore be taken into consideration for the discussion of spectra obtained from solution. Evidence for such solvent effects is provided by a relativistic density functional study of [(NC)(5)Pt-Tl(CN)](-) (I). It is demonstrated that the remarkable experimentally observed spin-spin coupling pattern, e.g., (2)J(Tl-C) >> (1)J(Tl-C) and J(Pt-Tl) approximately 57 kHz, is semiquantitatively reproduced by our calculations if both relativistic effects and solvation are taken into account. Solvent effects are very substantial and shift the Pt-Tl coupling by more than 100%, e.g. Relativistic increase of s-orbital density at the heavy nuclei, charge donation by the solvent, and the specific features of the multicenter C-Pt-Tl-C bond are responsible for the observed coupling pattern.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".