MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021448636 · doi:10.1109/ssp.2012.6319673

Distributed state estimation for large-scale nonlinear systems: A reduced order particle filter implementation

2012· article· en· W2021448636 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle filterMonte Carlo methodNonlinear systemComputer scienceFilter (signal processing)Sensor fusionState spaceState-space representationConsistency (knowledge bases)Scale (ratio)FusionState (computer science)Control theory (sociology)AlgorithmMathematicsPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivated by state estimation problems in power distribution networks (PDN), the paper proposes a fusion based, reduced order, distributed implementation of the particle filter (FR/DPF) for large scale, nonlinear dynamical systems with localized sensor observations. Direct application of the centralized particle filter is computationally challenging due to the high dimensions of the state-space dynamics. Based on partitioning the overall system into N localized but mathematically coupled subsystems, the near-optimal FR/DPF provides computational savings of a factor of N over the centralized particle filter implementation. By introducing distributed state and observation fusion steps, the proposed FR/DPF does not require a fusion centre and maintains consistency between the local sub-systems. In our Monte Carlo simulations of a simplified PDN, the performance of the FR/DPF is consistently close to that of the centralized implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it