MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021600662 · doi:10.2118/152422-ms

Fiber Optic Distributed Acoustic Sensing of Multiple Fractures in a Horizontal Well

2012· article· en· W2021600662 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsInversa Systems (Canada)Devon Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroseismHydraulic fracturingGeologyAcoustic emissionHigh resolutionDistributed acoustic sensingAcousticsComputer scienceRemote sensingOptical fiberPetroleum engineeringSeismologyFiber optic sensorTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper highlights the current state of fiber optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) technology by reviewing its application to hydraulic fracture diagnostics in a multi fractured horizontal well (MFHW). It will be shown that, with the advent of DAS, a gap in the feedback — which could previously occur using various hydraulic fracture diagnostic options — has been filled. Results are shared that were obtained from the first successful application of high resolution DAS during the placement of multiple hydraulic fractures in a horizontal well that was completed with an open hole packer and frac valve system. Observations of the real time acoustic soundfield in the near wellbore (NWB) region during hydraulic fracturing are presented as high resolution images. These images have enabled an analysis of key dynamic aspects of the fracturing process. In examining the resultant data, it has become apparent that DAS has overcome some limitations intrinsic in other diagnostic tools such as distributed temperature sensing (DTS), microseismic monitoring, and tracer programs. An overview of the well design is provided as well as selected samples from the dataset which highlight some of the events that were observed during the hydraulic fracturing process. Sample images are used to demonstrate the current capability of DAS measurement, selected both from the real time soundfield display (SFD) and from processed high resolution soundfield maps. DAS processing methods are briefly discussed, as well as two categories of field observations— which highlight some of the mechanical reliability aspects of the swell packer/ball actuated frac sleeve system, as well as some aspects of the near wellbore region during hydraulic fracturing such as single or multiple fracture initiation sites and the general behaviour of wellbore fluids over the course of the fracture treatment. Distributed acoustic sensing using a single mode optic fiber has been described in recent literature (Molenaar, 2011) for applications involving the recording of acoustic events during various stages of well completion and stimulation. The current paper provides further description on how DAS works and shares results from a high resolution DAS survey, obtained while placing multiple hydraulic fractures in a horizontal well, completed in a tight sand using an openhole ball actuated valve system with swell packers for fracture isolation. Earlier findings are supported, in particular that DAS will enable an improved understanding of in-wellbore activities and, in so doing, that it will enable optimization of hydraulic fracturing design and execution. It is recognized that much is yet to be learned in the processing of fiber optic DAS data, but also that it would be beneficial to share the work that has been completed to date to facilitate accelerated development of DAS processing technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it