MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021672805 · doi:10.2143/ast.40.1.2049225

Some Remarks on Delayed Renewal Risk Models

2010· article· en· W2021672805 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAstin Bulletin · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsIndependence (probability theory)Risk modelExponential functionProbabilistic logicApplied mathematicsMathematicsPenalty methodFunction (biology)Mathematical economicsMathematical optimizationStatisticsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Some extensions to the delayed renewal risk models are considered. In particular, the independence assumption between the interclaim time and the subsequent claim size is relaxed, and the classical Gerber-Shiu penalty function is generalized by incorporating more variables. As a result, general structures regarding various joint densities of ruin related quantities as well as their probabilistic interpretations are provided. The numerical example in case of time-dependent claim sizes is provided, and also the usual delayed model with time-independent claim sizes is discussed including a special case with exponential claim sizes. Furthermore, asymptotic formulas for the associated compound geometric tail for the present model are derived using two alternative methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it