MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021886563 · doi:10.1002/wcm.323

Adaptive polynomial predistorters for M‐QAM transmission using non‐linear power amplifiers

2006· article· en· W2021886563 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWireless Communications and Mobile Computing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPredistortionAmplifierBasebandComputer scienceIntermodulationQuadrature amplitude modulationPolynomialControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmMathematical optimizationMathematicsTelecommunicationsBit error rateBandwidth (computing)Decoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, adaptive baseband polynomial predistortion techniques are introduced to counter‐balance the AM/AM and AM/PM non‐linear effects of the transmit power amplifier. The proposed polynomial predistortion scheme is based on polar coordinate representation. Both LMS and RLS concepts are used to derive the adaptive algorithms. An enhanced LMS‐based algorithm with fast convergence and low complexity is proposed. For very fast convergence, a cascaded RLS‐based adaptive polynomial predistorter structure is introduced. The performance of the proposed schemes in terms of intermodulation distortion, spectral regrowth, and convergence rate are examined. The obtained results show that the polynomial predistortion schemes can be used in M‐QAM transmitters with power amplifiers operating near saturation to achieve a highest power efficiency. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it