MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022186693 · doi:10.1159/000067454

Hunting of Mammalian Prey by Budongo Forest Chimpanzees

2003· article· en· W2022186693 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFolia Primatologica · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPrimate Behavior and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDirektoratet for UtviklingssamarbeidNational Geographic Society
KeywordsTroglodytesPredationBiologyEcologyPongidaePrimateZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) predation has been found in communities across Africa. Little evidence of such behaviour has been previously reported from the Budongo Forest, western Uganda. Here we present preliminary observations of predatory behaviour for the Sonso community, collected between August 1994 and February 2002. We find that the Sonso chimpanzees do not appear to hunt frequently, despite a relatively high density of potential prey, particularly Colobus guereza and Cercopithecus mitis. They seem similar to other eastern chimpanzees in their focus on immature colobus monkeys and in targeting ungulates, and the absence of red colobus (Procolobus badius) - the most common prey species elsewhere for chimpanzees - may be a significant factor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it