MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022277600 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2010.5575241

Motion artifact removal from muscle NIR Spectroscopy measurements

2010· article· en· W2022277600 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal HealthVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtifact (error)Artificial intelligenceWaveletComputer scienceComputer visionSIGNAL (programming language)Sensitivity (control systems)Wavelet transformPattern recognition (psychology)Filter (signal processing)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) is an optical method used for monitoring local tissue oxygenation and hemodynamics. This method is becoming increasingly popular in clinical and research applications. One important shortcoming of NIRS is an extreme sensitivity to motion artifacts. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm for removing movement artifacts from NIRS signals. We applied wavelet transform and then used the signal representation in the wavelet domain to isolate the artifacts and remove them using statistical testing. We tested this method on both simulated and experimental NIRS data acquired in a leg fracture operation and compared the results with those of median filtering, FIR filtering and wavelet SURE threshold estimation methods. The results show that the method significantly reduces the artifacts without distorting the signal in artifact free regions and outperforms other artifact removal methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207