An integrated simdization framework using virtual vectors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Automatic simdization for multimedia extensions faces several new challenges that are not present in traditional vectorization. Some of the new issues are due to the more restrictive SIMD architectures designed for multimedia extensions. Among them are alignment constraints, lack of memory gather and scatter support, and the short and fixed-length nature of SIMD vectors. Since these constraints affect some very basic components of a program, a compiler must not only provide solid solutions to individual issues, but also take an integrated approach to address these constraints in combination.In this paper, we propose a simdization framework that addresses several orthogonal aspects of simdization, such as alignment handling, simdization of loops with mixed data lengths, and SIMD parallelism extraction from different program scopes (from basic blocks to inner loops). The novelty of this framework is its ability to facilitate interactions between different techniques based on the simple intermediate representation of virtual vectors. Measurements on a PPC970 with a VMX SIMD unit indicate speedup factors of up to 8.11 for numerical/video/communication kernels and speedup factors of up to 2.16 for benchmarks, when automatic simdization is turned on.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".