MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023381350 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2015.2402126

Resource Provisioning in Wireless Virtualized Networks via Massive-MIMO

2015· article· en· W2023381350 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProvisioningBase stationComputer networkWireless networkResource allocationWirelessFemtocellMIMOGeometric programmingOrthogonal frequency-division multiple accessDistributed computingMathematical optimizationChannel (broadcasting)Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexingTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter proposes a dynamic resource provisioning scheme for an OFDMA wireless virtualized network (WVN), where one base-station equipped with a large number of antennas serves users belonging to a number of service providers via different slices. In particular, joint power, sub-carrier, and antenna allocation problems are presented for both perfect and imperfect channel knowledge cases, aiming to maximize a sum-utility while maintaining a minimum rate per slice. Subsequently, relaxation and variable transformation are applied to develop the efficient algorithm to solve the formulated non-convex, combinational optimization problem. Simulation results reveal the benefits of applying a large number of antennas in this setup and evaluate the network performance for different system conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it