Evaluating virial coefficients for multicomponent mixtures: hard sphere mixtures and flexible chains
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A new algorithm to compute the virial coefficients of multicomponent mixtures is proposed. The number of graphs that must be evaluated increases dramatically in a multicomponent mixture so that it becomes difficult to enumerate and compute all possible graphs. However, once all of them are known and evaluated, the virial coefficient of the mixture can be evaluated for any composition. If one is interested in the virial coefficient of a mixture of a certain composition, then a simpler approach can be followed. Starting from the graphs of a pure fluid, we assign a random chemical identity to each of the molecules of the graph. The probability of assigning a given chemical identity is taken from the composition of the mixture. In this way composition is treated as a random variable within the Monte Carlo procedure which determines the virial coefficient. The algorithm is checked by comparison with the virial coefficients of binary hard spheres mixtures which are well known. Good agreement is found. The procedure is then extended to multicomponent mixtures of hard spheres. Finally the procedure is applied to the determination of the virial coefficients of a flexible molecule. For flexible molecules the possible configurations of the molecules are treated as different components of the mixture. In this way we present what appears to be the first determination of the third and fourth virial coefficients of polymers in the continuum. Notes MAPLE is a registered trade mark of Waterloo Maple Software, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it