MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023619989 · doi:10.1111/1467-9590.1071176

Pump Flow Solutions of the Navier–Stokes Equations

2001· article· en· W2023619989 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Applied Mathematics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVortexFlow (mathematics)Surface (topology)MechanicsAsymptoteNavier–Stokes equationsCore (optical fiber)PhysicsClassical mechanicsGeometryMathematicsOpticsCompressibility

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exact solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations are used to describe pump flows that involve the interaction of several different components. As an illustration of the general representations obtained, a detailed description is given of flows that involve both a swirl and a shear component. Such flows are common in the atmosphere. For example, they are produced in the core of a vortex as it moves over a horizontal surface into a region where the flow is sheared in a direction normal to the surface. Far from the surface, the vortex core translates in a direction parallel to the surface, and the flow asymptotes to that in an Ekman spiral. When the core rotates and translates with speeds that vary in time, the flow develops both updraft and downdraft regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it