MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023950493 · doi:10.1353/scp.2007.0018

Handoff, Dropkick, or Hail Mary Pass: Letting Go of an Academic Journal: The Council of Editors of Learned Journals (CELJ) Keynote Address MLA Convention 2005

2007· article· en· W2023950493 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Scholarly Publishing · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultidisciplinary Warburg-centric Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConventionObligationDocumentationTransition (genetics)Period (music)SociologyOperations researchPolitical sciencePublic relationsMedia studiesManagementLawComputer scienceEngineeringArtEconomicsAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drawing on his experience assuming and relinquishing the editorship of the award-winning journal Composition Studies, Peter Vandenberg suggests that a successful editorial transition is the final obligation of a retiring editor, particularly one without imposed term limits. The author illustrates why a successful transition begins with early planning, is made possible by ongoing documentation of practice throughout an editor's term, and culminates in effective mentoring as the new editor becomes acclimated. The author encourages editors to ensure that their commitment is sustained throughout the transition period by planning an exit strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.077
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Scholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0770.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.037
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it