MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

RAM POSITION CONTROL IN PLASTIC INJECTION MOLDING MACHINES WITH HIGHER-ORDER ITERATIVE LEARNING

2006· article· en· W2024010356 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaoli Li, Gaoxiang Ouyang, Xinping Guan, R. Du

Bibliographic record

VenueControl and Intelligent Systems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIterative learning controlControl theory (sociology)Position (finance)Controller (irrigation)Injection molding machineConvergence (economics)Molding (decorative)Feed forwardComputer sciencePID controllerControl engineeringNonlinear systemControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceTemperature controlMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In plastic injection molding, the ram position plays an important role in production quality. This paper introduces a new method, which is a combination of the current cycle feedback control (a PI controller) and a feed-forward higher-order iterative learning control (ILC), to control the ram position in injection molding. The PI controller is used to stabilize the system, and the feed-forward higher-order ILC control is used to compensate for nonlinear/unknown dynamics and disturbances, thereby gaining the precision tracking to ram position. The simulation results indicate that the new method outperforms the conventional PI controller. In addition, it outperforms the conventional ILC in the convergence performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueControl and Intelligent SystemsSame topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207