MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024013253 · doi:10.1186/cc891

Treatment of hypophosphataemia in critically ill patients with a two day dosing regimen

2000· article· en· W2024013253 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Research and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
FundersEuropean Society of Intensive Care MedicineDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDeutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
KeywordsMedicineCritically illDosingIntensive care medicineRegimenPediatricsPharmacologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The awareness of the diagnostic difficulty and the documented high mortality risk of perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI) has led to the wide use of work up to rule out PMI after major noncardiac operations.This has caused stable postoperative patients to be kept in monitored hospital beds for extended periods of time and to be subjected to additional tests.We hypothesized that the mortality of PMI is high and, therefore, the wide use of postoperative work up to identify these patients is justifiable.We performed the following study to prove our hypothesis.All patients in the recovery room after major noncardiac operations who underwent work up to rule out PMI were identified and followed.The PMI work up included care in an electronically monitored unit, physical assessment, continuous ECG monitoring, and three 12lead electrocardiograms and cardiac enzymes obtained at six to eight hour intervals.Data collection included patient demographics; preoperative cardiac risk factors; incidence of intraoperative hypotension, hemorrhage and ECG changes; type of anesthesia and operative procedures and their durations; postoperative ECG and cardiac enzyme results; the incidence of PMI and patient outcome.Two hundred patients were studied; 85 males and 115 females.Their mean age was 62.9 years.Preexisting conditions included hypertension in 162 patients, peripheral arterial disease in 102, diabetes mellitus in 97, angina in 30, previous myocardial infarction in 41, and smoking in 107.Of 200 patients, 164 had an abnormal preoperative ECG.Vascular operations were performed in 104 patients, nonvascular abdominal operations in 48, and other operations in the remaining 48.Intraoperatively, hypotension occurred in 29 patients, blood loss of >500 ml in 25 and ECG changes in 10.There were no deaths.PMI occurred in 5/200 (2.5%) patients.Four had undergone vascular operations and one had had an abdominal operation.The mean age of the patients with PMI was 64.2 years.The duration of operation and blood loss were similar to those of patients without PMI.None of these patients developed cardiac failure or cardiogenic shock and none of them died. Conclusion:The incidence of PMI among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery is low and its mortality is negligible.Physicians should become more selective in the use of monitored beds and in the ordering of a work up to rule out PMI. P2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.882

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it