MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024218073 · doi:10.1145/1066078.1066081

A speech synthesizer for Persian text using a neural network with a smooth ergodic HMM

2005· article· en· W2024218073 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePreprocessorSpeech recognitionSpeech synthesisHidden Markov modelArtificial neural networkIntelligibility (philosophy)Natural language processingArtificial intelligenceActive listeningLanguage modelTime delay neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The feasibility of converting text into speech using an inexpensive computer with minimal memory is of great interest. Speech synthesizers have been developed for many popular languages (e.g., English, Chinese, Spanish, French, etc.), but designing a speech synthesizer for a language is largely dependant on the language structure. In this article, we develop a Persian synthesizer that includes an innovative text analyzer module. In the synthesizer, the text is segmented into words and after preprocessing, a neural network is passed over each word. In addition to preprocessing, a new model (SEHMM) is used as a postprocessor to compensate for errors generated by the neural network. The performance of the proposed model is verified and the intelligibility of the synthetic speech is assessed via listening tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it