MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024379881 · doi:10.1021/jp021669q

Dehalogenation of 5-Halouracils after Low Energy Electron Attachment:  A Density Functional Theory Investigation

2002· article· en· W2024379881 on OpenAlexaff
Xifeng Li, Léon Sanche, Michael D. Sevilla

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDensity functional theoryBond-dissociation energyElectron affinity (data page)MoleculeElectronHalogenationDissociation (chemistry)Potential energyIonRadicalCovalent bondHalogenComputational chemistryAtomic physicsPhysical chemistryPhysicsQuantum mechanicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this density functional theory investigation of the radiosensitization properties of 5-halogen-substituted uracils, the potential energy surfaces of the halouracils before and after electron attachment are investigated. The electron affinities (EA's) of uracil, halouracils, and uracilyl radical (U-yl • ) are calculated. The gas-phase adiabatic EA's of the halouracils after zero point energy (ZPE) corrections are in good agreement with those reported recently (Wetmore, S. D.; Boyd, R. J.; Eriksson, L. A. Chem. Phys. Lett . 2001, 343, 151−158). The U-yl • radical has an exceptionally high AEA of 2.34 eV and proton affinity of 9.5 eV in the gas phase, showing its reactive nature and potential to cause DNA damage when incorporated in the genome. The higher EA of the halouracils compared to that of the DNA bases supports the experimental reports on the increased probability of low-energy electrons to localize on halouracils in DNA, leading to dehalogenation reactions and DNA damage. Potential energy surfaces (PES) are calculated for dehalogenation to show the relative energy change in the dissociation of halogen from both the neutral molecule and anion radical. The PESs along the C 5 −X bond of all neutral molecules including uracil show the typical surface expected for a strong covalent bond rupture. Each of the halouracil anion radicals is found to have two thermally accessible electronic states of differing symmetries, i.e., π*(A") and σ*(A ’ ), that have quite differing properties. Both the pure π* state and the σ* state feature planar geometries. The pure π* state has a PES similar to that of the neutral molecule with a strong C−X bond, while the σ* state shows far weaker C−X bonding. Moreover, there is a mixed state PES that undergoes a transition from a slightly nonplanar π* state to that of a σ* state as the C−X bond distance increases to the crossing point of the two PES. From the full PES that allows for state crossing, the lowest energy barriers for formation of the extended σ* states are estimated to be 20.80, 3.99, and 1.88 kcal/mol for F-, Cl-, and Br-substituted uracil anion radicals, respectively. The overall energetics suggest that the π* to σ* conversions are exothermic for ClU and BrU anions, with Δ H calculated to be −0.98 and −2.98 kcal/mol, Δ G, −2.32 and −3.80 kcal/mol at 298 K and 1 atm, respectively. Remarkably, for the F−U anion the lowest energy path is not the loss of fluoride ion but the detachment of HF. The sensitivity of the halouracils to low-energy electrons is found to be on the order of BrU ≈ ClU ≫ FU, in agreement with experimental observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations125
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207