MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024422132 · doi:10.1177/03063968030452002

The `Exotic' as Mass Entertainment: Denmark 1878—1909

2003· article· en· W2024422132 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRace & Class · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCulinary Culture and Tourism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les deux dernieres decennies du 19 eme siecle et la premiere decennie du 20 eme ont constitue un sommet pour les expositions de peuples exotiques au Danemark, comme dans la plupart des autres pays d'Europe occidentale. Avec au moins trente-trois expositions, le spectacle des peuples exotiques, lointains, primitifs, orientaux est devenu non seulement un divertissement de masse, mais fut egalement instrumentalise par la science, et notamment l'ethnographie et l'anthropologie, pour ses recherches. A travers le discours (et la pratique) de la sexualite, de l'authenticite et de la naturalite, ces expositions ont contribue a maintenir et a preserver un ordre mondial non seulement europeen et blanc, mais egalement masculin dans sa domination. La presentation de peuples exotiques dans des villages primitifs confirmait les stereotypes raciaux de la societe blanche sur les societes non-blanches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it