MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024496038 · doi:10.3138/md.2012-0503

Bernard Shaw’s Stalinist Allegory: <i>The Simpleton of the Unexpected Isles</i>

2013· article· en· W2024496038 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiterature Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllegoryHyperbolePoliticsComicsState (computer science)ExaggerationRhetoricPolitical scienceLiteratureLawHistoryArtPhilosophyPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: For over fifty years, playwright George Bernard Shaw called for the state extermination of the incorrigibly criminal or anti-social. Yet these statements have usually been dismissed as expressions of Shaw’s well-known propensity for comic exaggeration and hyperbole, his pugnacious rhetoric, his love of paradox, and especially, his addiction to antagonizing the British political establishment. Nonetheless, as this article shows, Shaw was not joking, and in fact, gave full support to the liquidation policies that arose in the totalitarian countries in the thirties, especially those in the Soviet Union. His 1934 play The Simpleton of the Unexpected Isles, although rarely recognized as such, is actually an allegory of the Soviet Union that gives especial attention to the totalitarian state’s uncompromising policy of disposing of recalcitrant citizens. The article analyses the play in light of Shaw’s 1931 visit to the Soviet Union and his vociferous support of its political agenda under Stalin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it