MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024576103 · doi:10.1063/1.1371281

Monte Carlo simulation study of the Fano factor, <i>w</i> value, and energy resolution for the absorption of soft x rays in xenon–neon gas mixtures

2001· article· en· W2024576103 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaGraduate and Professional Student Council, University of Arizona
KeywordsAtomic physicsXenonNeonNoble gasFano factorIonizationPhotoionizationPenning ionizationMonte Carlo methodKryptonAbsorption (acoustics)ElectronPhysicsChemistryIonArgonNuclear physicsDetectorOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Xenon gas proportional-scintillation counters (GPSC) have many applications in the detection of soft x rays where their energy resolution, R, is comparable to solid-state detectors when large window areas are required. However, R is known to deteriorate for energies Exr below 2–3 keV due to electron loss to the entrance window. Since the addition of a lighter noble gas increases the absorption depth, we have investigated the use of Xe–Ne gas mixtures at atmospheric pressure as detector fillings. The results of a Monte Carlo simulation study of the Fano factor, F, the w value, and the intrinsic energy resolution, R=2.36(Fw/Exr)1/2, are presented for Xe–Ne mixtures and pure Xe and Ne. The results show that the addition of Ne to Xe reduces the intrinsic energy resolution ℛ but this never compensates for the reduction in scintillation yield in GPSC applications, implying that the instrumental energy resolution R will only improve with the addition of Ne when electron loss to the window in pure Xe is significant. The simulation reproduces the photoionization process of the Xe and Ne atoms, the vacancy cascade decay of the residual ions, and the elastic and inelastic scattering of electrons by the gas atoms. The contribution of energy and charge transfer mechanisms such as Penning, associative, and transfer ionization is discussed in detail. It is shown that Penning and associative ionization are the crucial indirect ionization processes which determine the behavior of F and w at low concentrations of Xe. The importance of the nonmetastable Ne states is also assessed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it