Endocrine Profile and Neuroendocrine Challenge Tests in Transgenic Mice Expressing Antisense RNA against the Glucocorticoid Receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A transgene expressing antisense RNA complementary to a fragment of the glucocorticoid receptor cDNA was incorporated into the mouse genome and resulted in a transgenic animal that has decreased glucocorticoid receptor function. The transgenic mice showed basal plasma ACTH and corticosterone levels similar to those of the normal control animals. We have further investigated changes in HPA axis regulation by use of different neuroendocrine challenge tests including a dexamethasone suppression test (DST). In comparison to normal mice, a tenfold higher dose of dexamethasone (i.e. 20 micrograms/100 g body weight) was required to suppress the basal corticosterone levels of transgenic mice. Dexamethasone (2 micrograms/100 g body weight) produced a long-lasting suppression of plasma ACTH and corticosterone levels in control mice, whereas in transgenic animals only a short-lasting decrease in ACTH levels was apparent. Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) administration resulted in an enhanced response in plasma ACTH levels in transgenic mice, whereas the corticosterone response was markedly reduced. The discrepancy between ACTH and corresponding corticosterone secretions in transgenic mice could be attributed, in part, to a reduced sensitivity of the adrenal gland to stimulation by ACTH. Pituitaries of transgenic mice contained about 50% less proopiomelanocortin (POMC) mRNA than those of control animals. No significant differences were noted in the ACTH or protein contents of normal and transgenic mice pituitary glands although a slight increase in protein content of the transgenic mouse adrenal gland was apparent. In conclusion, transgenic mice with impaired GR function show major disturbances in HPA axis regulation which seem to be caused by the primary defect in conjunction with secondary modifications in, amongst others, pituitary CRH receptor system(s), sympathetic output and adrenal development. This mouse is therefore a useful model to study the consequences of life-long defective GR function and HPA axis regulation in general.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".