MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W202469502 · doi:10.1021/cen-v083n024.p006

ACTION ON GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE

2005· article· en· W202469502 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical & Engineering News · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeAction (physics)BusinessEnvironmental scienceNatural resource economicsPolitical scienceEconomicsOceanographyGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THE U.S. NATIONAL ACADEMY of Sciences and groups from 10 other nations are contending that the scientific evidence on global climate change is now clear enough for government leaders to commit to prompt action. Their June 7 statement was timed to coincide with U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair's meeting with President George W. Bush in Washington, D.C. The academies from the U.S., UK, Germany, Italy, France, Russia, Japan, Canada, Brazil, China, and India called on nations to identify cost-effective steps to take now to contribute to longterm reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. A delay, they said, will increase environmental damage and likely incur a greater cost. In releasing the statement, Robert Lord May of Oxford University president of Britain's Royal Society, said, "It is clear that world leaders can no longer use uncertainty about aspects of climate change as an excuse for not taking urgent action." He called U.S. policy on climate ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it