MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024808748 · doi:10.1080/1361332042000234286

Parental expectations of Chinese immigrants: a folk theory about children's school achievement

2004· article· en· W2024808748 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRace Ethnicity and Education · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnculturationAcculturationImmigrationChinese americansPsychologyFeelingSociologyAcademic achievementSocial psychologyQualitative researchDevelopmental psychologyPedagogySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To understand parental expectations in Chinese immigrant families in Canada, this qualitative study intends to uncover a folk theory grounded in the perspectives and experiences of a group of recent Chinese immigrant parents and children. As a tradition, the parents emphasize the importance of school achievement and moral character. In response to their life disadvantages in Canada, the parents rely on science‐related career aspirations and cultural integration to help optimize their children's future. While the majority of the children hold parallel views and share similar expectations with their parents, some children experience intense feelings in reconciling vast differences presented in the dual process of enculturation and acculturation. Cultural expectations, perceived minority immigrant status, and tension inherent in the process of acculturation are three intertwined forces underpinning the evolving relationship between parental expectations and children's school achievement in these Chinese immigrant families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it