MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025035056 · doi:10.1159/000195872

Influence of Nocturnal Oxygen Desaturation on Circadian Rhythm of Testosterone Secretion

2009· article· en· W2025035056 on OpenAlexaff
Shiro Kouchiyama, Yoshiyuki Honda, Takayuki Kuriyama

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiration · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCircadian rhythm and melatonin
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircadian rhythmTestosterone (patch)NocturnalMedicineInternal medicinePolysomnographyEndocrinologyOxygenApneaChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To investigate the influence of nocturnal oxygen desaturation on the circadian rhythm of testosterone secretion, polysomnography was performed on 2 consecutive nights in 24 male subjects who complained of loud snoring and/or obesity. During the first night, we collected blood samples every 4 h via a catheter and measured serum testosterone. We arbitrarily defined severe oxygen desaturation as that exceeding the baseline SaO2 by 4% during 80 min of total sleep time. The subjects were divided into 2 groups from the data of the second night; one was the severe desaturation group as mentioned above, and those who suffered less desaturation were classified as the free to mild oxygen desaturation group. We found that in the latter group peak testosterone levels appeared at 6 a.m. On the other hand, the severe desaturation group exhibited delayed peak testosterone levels, i.e. at 10 a.m. We calculated the ratio of the testosterone level at 10 a.m. to that at 6 a.m., and found a significant correlation between this ratio and total desaturation time (r = 0.446, p less than 0.05). These data suggest that severe oxygen desaturation may alter the circadian rhythm of testosterone secretion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRespirationSame topicCircadian rhythm and melatoninFrench-language works237,207