MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Homogeneous Octacalcium Phosphate Precipitation: Effect of Temperature and pH

2003· article· en· W2025173639 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOctacalcium phosphatePrecipitationMaterials scienceParticle (ecology)SPHERESParticle sizePhosphateAtmospheric temperature rangeRange (aeronautics)Fourier transform infrared spectroscopyChemical engineeringCrystallographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Inorganic chemistryChemistryThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryChromatographyComposite materialOrganic chemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Octacalcium phosphate (OCP) was prepared by homogenous precipitation at 40 to 60degreesC in the pH range 6.0 to 7.5 and depending on conditions either no precipitate was formed or a variety of morphologies of OCP were produced. At a given temperature, in low pH conditions no precipitate was formed, at higher pHs large OCP particles were precipitated which were spherical in shape with long plate-like (LP) crystals radiating from a central nucleus. At higher pH, within a very narrow pH range, the spherical particles were covered by short-plate (SP) like crystals. As the pH was raised further, aggregated spheres (AS) of poorly crystalline OCP were precipitated. The spherical crystals had a mean particle size range from 20 to 1000 mum. FTIR spectra of AS were more similar to that of hydroxyapatite than OCP. As the size of the precipitated particles increased, the spectral similarity with OCP also increased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it