MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025335753 · doi:10.3139/217.1643

Three-dimensional Filling and Post-filling Simulation of Polymer Injection Molding

2001· article· en· W2025335753 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Polymer Processing · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInjection Molding Process and Properties
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMolding (decorative)CompressibilityFinite element methodConservation of massEnergy conservationMomentum (technical analysis)Mechanical engineeringPolymerProcess (computing)MechanicsBlow moldingComposite materialComputer scienceStructural engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents a finite element solution algorithm to solve polymer injection molding problems. The methodology solves the momentum, mass and energy conservation equations in three-dimensions. Packing and cooling stages of the injection molding process are modeled by considering compressibility effects. The procedure is aimed at processes in which three-dimensional effects are important. The method is also shown to be effective for thin parts. The performance of the proposed approach is measured on the injection of a plate for which experimental data are available. The procedure is also applied to a thick 3D part. The method results in accurate solutions and it is a useful tool to quantify the material behavior on cases otherwise difficult to investigate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it