MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025480057 · doi:10.2118/170150-ms

Kinetic Modeling of the In-Situ Combustion Process for Athabasca Oil Sands

2014· article· en· W2025480057 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)University of CalgaryDevon Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil sandsCombustionPyrolysisCrackingMass transferChemistrySteam injectionHydrocarbonDecompositionChemical reactionChemical kineticsViscosityThermal decompositionEnhanced oil recoveryHeat transferKineticsAtmospheric temperature rangeProcess (computing)ThermodynamicsChemical engineeringPetroleum engineeringMaterials scienceAsphaltOrganic chemistryGeologyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In-situ combustion (ISC) is an effective thermal recovery method that provides an important alternative to steam injection, but it has yet to be widely applied due to the complexity of the process. The modeling of ISC requires an understanding of the behavior of different physical phenomena including phase change, heat and mass transfer, and chemical reactions. Properly conducted ramped temperature oxidation (RTO) tests on crude oil provide critical parameters for modeling. In this study, the focus is to model appropriate kinetics and improve reaction models for ISC. Different chemical reactions occur during ISC in different temperature ranges. For heavy oils and oil sands low temperature oxidation (LTO) dominates below 260°C, yielding partially oxygenated compounds and increasing the viscosity of oil, and as a result, limiting the success of the ISC process. The so-called middle temperature oxidation (MTO) region is a combination of the negative temperature gradient region (NTGR) as well as the onset of thermal decomposition and pyrolysis/cracking of the hydrocarbon phase, some or all of which may have been previously oxidized. Above 350°C, high temperature oxidation (HTO) dominates, representing the more commonly known traditional combustion region. Most of the current reaction kinetics models for ISC only focus on specific conditions such as HTO and are not able to represent the wide range of reactions that occur over a larger temperature range. The objective of this study was to develop reaction kinetic models that can be used to describe the reactions of hydrocarbon fractions at various temperature conditions during the ISC of Athabasca bitumen. In this work, a set of improved kinetic models including LTO, MTO, and HTO reactions based on Saturates, Aromatics, Resins, and Asphaltenes (SARA) fractions in the crude oil are established. These kinetic models are used to reproduce the RTO experimental results through numerical simulation. This research will contribute to the development of more reliable numerical models that can predict ISC performance in different temperature scenarios with greater accuracy and reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it