MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025536958 · doi:10.1029/2009jb006376

A multiscale model of partial melts: 2. Numerical results

2010· article· en· W2025536958 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomogenization (climate)Boundary value problemPorous mediumPermeability (electromagnetism)PorosityViscosityVolume viscosityMicroscopic scale

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the companion paper, equations for partially molten media were derived using two‐scale homogenization theory. This approach begins with a grain‐scale description and then coarsens it through multiple scale expansions into a macroscopic model. One advantage of homogenization is that effective material properties, such as permeability and the shear and bulk viscosity of the two‐phase medium, are characterized by cell problems, boundary value problems posed on a representative microstructural cell. The solutions of these problems can be averaged to obtain macroscopic parameters that are consistent with a given microstructure. This is particularly important for estimating the “compaction length” which depends on the product of permeability and bulk viscosity and is the intrinsic length scale for viscously deformable two‐phase flow. In this paper, we numerically solve ensembles of cell problems for several geometries. We begin with simple intersecting tubes, as this is a one parameter family of problems with well‐known results for permeability. Using the data, we estimate relationships between the porosity and all of the effective parameters by curve fitting. For the model of intersecting tubes, permeability scales as ϕ n , n ∼ 2, as expected, and the bulk viscosity scales as ϕ − m , m ∼ 1, which has been speculated but never shown directly for deformable porous media. The second set of cell problems adds spherical inclusions where the tubes intersect. For these geometries, the permeability is controlled the pore throats and not by the total porosity, as expected. However, the bulk viscosity remains inversely proportional to the porosity, and we conjecture that this quantity is insensitive to the specific microstructure. The computational machinery developed can be applied to more general geometries, such as texturally equilibrated pore shapes. However, we suspect that the qualitative behavior of our simplified models persists in these more realistic structures. In particular, our hybrid numerical‐analytical model predicts that for purely mechanical coupling at the microscale, all homogenized models will have a compaction length that vanishes as porosity goes to zero. This has implications for numerical simulations, and it suggests that these models might not resist complete compaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it