Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Trichotillomania, Targeting Perfectionism
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trichotillomania or hair pulling has been considered mainly as a tensionreducing habit. However, other cognitive, emotional, and situational factors have been identified as important in the development andmaintenance of this disorder. The present case study applied habit reversal techniques, with the addition of a cognitive modification of perfectionist beliefs and style of action, in the treatment of a 23-year-old woman. During an 18-week period, her hair-pulling behavior decreased from a mean of 24 hairs pulled each day to 1 hair pulled overall in a week. A 1.5-year follow-up showed that the client suffered a small relapse during a period of 2 weeks. A self-imposed return to cognitive and behavioral techniques eliminated further pulling. This single case report raises the possibility that perfectionismmay be an important target for cognitive-behavioral treatment intervention in habit disorders such as trichotillomania.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it