MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025636051 · doi:10.2307/2672319

The Riddle of Malaysian Capitalism: Rent-seekers or Real Capitalists?.

2000· article· en· W2025636051 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Affairs · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalayCronyismCapitalismState (computer science)Context (archaeology)State capitalismCapital (architecture)PoliticsPolitical economyPolitical scienceEconomicsLawGeographyHistoryAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TablesFiguresAbbreviationsPrefaceIntroductionPART I - THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT: STATE AND CAPITAL TO 1990Malaysian political economy: an overviewThe state and the expansion of Malay ownershipPART II - MALAY CAPITALISTS: STATE, PARTY, POLITICAL AND PRIVATEThe new Malay state: catalyst for capitalism or cronyism?The party: UMNO's role in the development of Malay capitalismPolitical capitalists: relations between party capital and private Malay capitalPrivate Malay capital: rentiers, transitional groups and entrepreneursPART III - CHINESE CAPITALISTS: PARIAHS OR ENTREPRENEURS?MPHB: the failure of the Chinese 'institutional' approachChinese business groups: new wealthChinese business groups: old wealthConclusionSelected interviewsNotesBibliographyIndex

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it